On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:36:50PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> 
> > On 16 Dec 2016, at 14:24, Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:48:56PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> 6087bis says in sec. 5.10:
> >> 
> >>  Top-level database data definitions MUST NOT be mandatory.
> >> 
> >> It think this makes sense only for config=true nodes. It is absolutely OK 
> >> to have mandatory top-level state data, and some published modules already 
> >> have them, e.g. ietf-yang-library.
> >> 
> >> Also, I wonder - should the text use "datastore" rather than "database"?
> >> 
> > 
> > We should not use the term 'database'. I do no think 'datastore' is
> > the appropriate replacement. Since this document talks about YANG, I
> > think the proper terms are data tree and schema tree (or any other
> > terms that the YANG specification defines).
> 
> Right - I think the following should do:
> 
> OLD
> 
>   Top-level database data definitions MUST NOT be mandatory.
> 
> NEW
> 
>   Top-level data nodes that represent configuration MUST NOT be mandatory.
>

There are a few more occurances of the word 'database' that should all
be rewritten to use YANG terminology.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to