I don't understand!
- s.4.2
"The following example is for the '2010-01-18' revision of the
'ietf-foo' module: "
compared with
"
revision 2016-03-20 { description "Latest revision"; reference "RFC
XXXX";
"
and I would add an RFC Editor note for XXXX to replace XXXX with the
number of this RFC once published.
- 50 pages in I come across to reference to YANG 1.1 - this may come as
a shock to some; it left me wondering about the applicability of the
first 50 pages; I think this should be clarified if only for those who
may be unaware of the concurrent existence of different versions of
YANG.
- IANA Considerations
I-D 5226bis suggests a form of words such as
" Because this document obsoletes RFC 4637, IANA is asked to change
all registration information that references [RFC4637] to instead
reference [[this RFC]]."
with /4367/6087/ in this case; I would find that clearer. The current
text talks of changes and I see none, apart from Appendix B to Appendix
C and this does not figure on the IANA pages.
I have not read the I-D and do not have a view on whether or not it is
ready to advance.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Bjorklund" <m...@tail-f.com>
To: <a...@yumaworks.com>
Cc: <netmod@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:00 AM
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
