Hi Rob,
On 2/27/2017 3:31 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
>> Hi Kent, Lou,
>>
>> I think that it might possibly be a good idea to please align the
>> timelines for:
>>
>> draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
>> draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-yang
>>
>> because I think that it will be somewhat helpful to review both
>> documents together.
> Can you provide dates you think we can commit to?
>
>
>> Also, I just wanted to confirm that the datastore work is covered by
>> this text:
>>
>> c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are used.
>> This effort entails describing the context that network management
>> protocols (e.g., NETCONF, RESTCONF, CoAP, etc.) operate in, and
>> how certain YANG statements interact in that context.
> Yes indeed, or at least, that was the intention. Here "conceptual framework"
> and "context" are meant to be more all-encompassing than just the datastores
> effort. Makes sense, or needs clarification?
Does this help?
c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are
used. This effort entails describing the generic context in
which YANG exists and how certain YANG statements interact in
that context. An example of this is YANG's relationship with
datastores.
Lou
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // co-chair
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
