On 27/02/2017 21:41, Lou Berger wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 2/27/2017 3:31 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
Hi Rob,
Hi Kent, Lou,
I think that it might possibly be a good idea to please align the
timelines for:
draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-yang
because I think that it will be somewhat helpful to review both
documents together.
Can you provide dates you think we can commit to?
Also, I just wanted to confirm that the datastore work is covered by
this text:
c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are used.
This effort entails describing the context that network management
protocols (e.g., NETCONF, RESTCONF, CoAP, etc.) operate in, and
how certain YANG statements interact in that context.
Yes indeed, or at least, that was the intention. Here "conceptual framework"
and "context" are meant to be more all-encompassing than just the datastores
effort. Makes sense, or needs clarification?
Does this help?
c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are
used. This effort entails describing the generic context in
which YANG exists and how certain YANG statements interact in
that context. An example of this is YANG's relationship with
datastores.
Yes, I think that this text is better.
Thanks,
Rob
Lou
Thanks,
Kent // co-chair
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
