Lou,
In all my WGs, we consistently documented the intended status in the
milestones, expressing the _intended _status at the time of the charter
discussion
Regards, Benoit
Juergen,
Thank you for the input. I think your point highlights how the
technical contents of a document drives the intended status of a
document.
Lou
PS as a reminder to all, intended status of documents is *not*
typically included in charters and are not included in the distributed
version.
On March 16, 2017 2:44:53 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
That said different people including Netconf WG co-chairs think the DS
concept document is Informational in nature and should be published
as an
Informational concept to be used in and adopted for the needs in
diverse
protocol WGs. This is as I think also important to avoid an overlapping
between NETCONF and NETMOD charters.
The current datastore draft includes concrete YANG idenity definitions
for datastores and origins and these definitions better be standards
track.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
