All, We're a couple days away from the 2-week window. As of now, the majority does not support adopting this draft. Any remaining opinions?
Lada, The objections seem to be concern for net readability, and for the importance of the problem relative to other activities. For the former case, it may help if you posted some examples. For the latter case, we may want to keep this draft cooking in the background. Kent // as co-chair and potential shepherd Phil Shafer <[email protected]> writes: > Andy Bierman writes: >>IMO it is more robust not to assume people never see the real YANG >>statements. > > Exactly. We made YANG readable so that we wouldn't _need_ to view > it using tools. This was one of the "insta-death" factors for UML. I have to reiterate that the idea is to continue to be able to view YANG modules *without* using tools, but provide some aid to tools that can make use of certain well-defined lightweight markup conventions. Everybody with a practical experience of converting YANG automatically to something else (not only to HTML, it starts already with YIN) knows that transferring descriptions and other similar texts is tricky. Lada > > Thanks, > Phil > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
