> On 1 May 2017, at 17:08, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This concludes the 2-week adoption poll for yang-markup. There does not seem > to > be sufficient interest to move this draft forward at this time. These results > are similar to comments in the Chicago meeting.
I have to disagree with the latter. The overall reaction during the Chicago meeting was IMO rather positive, and minutes that you just posted support this - "good number" in favour versus "1, sort of". Lada > Let's keep this one on the back > burner for now. > > Thanks, > Kent (and Lou) > > ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE----- > > All, > > This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a > NETMOD working group document: > > draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00 > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd > like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > Thank you, > NETMOD WG Chairs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
