Regarding the suggestion to add this text:
> Guidelines for > moving existing data modules to the NMDA are defined in > [I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines]. I'm hoping that we do not progress the guidelines doc. Ideally 6087bis can just state what people should do, without providing a formula for transitioning. I thought 6087bis is supposed to point people to the NMDA guidelines. That is why 6087bis has been held back for so long, even though it was supposed to be published with YANG 1.1. We waste a lot of time refactoring drafts and re-reviewing them. IMO the RD guidelines should be in the RD draft. <KENT> I thought that this was settled before (maybe not): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/pDLDm8gdIBwwyGyfa_acVKHtu_Q
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
