Hi Martin, On 8/30/17, 6:28 AM, "Martin Bjorklund" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, > >Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00 > >I found some trivial errors in this draft: > > o The revision for ietf-routing doesn't match the filename's date. > > o The filename for ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements is wrong (last > "s" is missing) > > o All the old -state definitions are removed, rather than being > marked as "deprecated". I’m glad you brought this up. We discussed this in the Routing YANG Design Team and were planning to discuss it on a wide scale. One of the advantages of the NMDA is that it makes the models easier to read and consume. This is somewhat negated if we have to retain all these data nodes in the associated modules and mark them as “deprecated”. What is the consequence of not including them? They are available in the previous version of the model if they are need for compatibility. Thanks, Acee > > >/martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
