Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > Kent, > > Hey folks, > > > > As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing > > RFCs to align them with NMDA. The first batch have been published as > > individual drafts: > > > > 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 > > 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 > > 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00 > Good. And there is one more in for NETMOD, as discussed in > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessa-nmda-qa: > RFC 7317 > In NETCONF, we have also: > RFC 6022, no I-D submitted yet
I don't think this one requires an update at this time. *If* it is changed, it might be worthwhile to remove definitions already covered by yang-library, and probably align with the netconf server model. > RFC 7895, already adopted > RFC 8040, no I-D submitted yet. No immediate plan to update? We have draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf-00 which "Updates: 8040". /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
