Hi Acee, > Ok - it is less painful if we only have to deprecate the *-state nodes.
Does this mean you're okay reposting your ID similar to Martin's? I ask as a chair interested in starting the adoption process on these nmda-update drafts. > However, what about secondary and tertiary implications of moving to > NDMA? If we change a path from “interface-state-ref” to “interface-ref” > to reference an interface, I’d hope no one would expect the old > statement to be kept around… But the old statement would be kept around, in its deprecated form. Of course, the nmda-guidelines should cause those downstream modules to be updated to NMDA as well, so hopefully just a short-lived issue. Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
