>>Does this mean you're okay reposting your ID similar to Martin's? >>I ask as a chair interested in starting the adoption process on >>these nmda-update drafts. > > I would hope this is not a prerequisite? We are evaluating how bad this > will be. I’d ask how many implementations there are of ietf-routing?
Yes, please provide this info when you have it. >>> However, what about secondary and tertiary implications of moving to >>> NDMA? If we change a path from “interface-state-ref” to “interface-ref” >>> to reference an interface, I’d hope no one would expect the old >>> statement to be kept around… >> >>But the old statement would be kept around, in its deprecated form. >>Of course, the nmda-guidelines should cause those downstream modules >>to be updated to NMDA as well, so hopefully just a short-lived issue. > > This could be really ugly and cascade if we are just using a different > path for a reference. Hopefully, all the old references are in deprecated > trees. Otherwise, I guess the new data leaf would need a unique name. Indeed. Let's see what the analysis reveals. Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
