Hi Rob, On 9/14/17, 9:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of rwil...@cisco.com> wrote:
>Hi Kent & Lou, > >When do you think that it will be possible to start the adoption process >on these drafts? > >I think that the first two at least would seem to be ready for >adoption. For the 3rd draft, there still seems to be an open question >of what to do with the old state tree, but presumably that could be >solved after the draft has been adopted? This is prefect timing. We discussed this issue at some length in the YANG Routing Design Team and the course we on is publishing a new model which is unencumbered from the current ietf-routing model. Refer to: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis/ Thanks, Acee > >Thanks, >Rob > > >On 30/08/2017 00:46, Kent Watsen wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing >>RFCs to align them with NMDA. The first batch have been published as >>individual drafts: >> >> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 >> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 >> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00 >> >> Please take a look (comments welcome!) and stay tuned for the related >>adoption calls. >> >> Thanks, >> Kent (and Lou) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> . >> > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >netmod@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
