> A new module name mandates a new namespace, so they go together. > Abandoning the old module is fine, except leaving that module with > status "current" is not fine. IMO you need to republish the old module > as well, with everything status obsolete.
Agreed. If a new module-name is used (e.g., routing-cfg-2), then the old module name should be republished also, just to deprecate (obsolete?) the old module. The deprecated module could be published in this draft or another draft (keep rfc8022bis clean?) As co-chair, I'm okay with adoption starting even without this detail finalized up front. K.
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
