I have read this draft and believe it is ready for publication. One question I have is why rfc7223bis not reference NMDA guidelines since it get in line with NMDA guideline, or NMDA guideline has been merged into rfc6087bis? Should this draft reference rfc6087bis?
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Kent Watsen 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29 收件人: [email protected] 抄送: [email protected] 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two drafts [2] should reveal just this. The working group last call ends on December 12. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and important, even from authors. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.txt Thank you, Netmod Chairs _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
