Alex Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On page 37, "duplex" is mistyped as "duplexx".

Thanks, now fixed.


/martin


> 
> Other than this minor error, I believe this draft is ready for publication.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Kent Watsen 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2017 8:29 a.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> 
> All,
> 
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.
> 
> Please recall that this update's intention is to
> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
> 
> The working group last call ends on December 12.
> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.txt
> 
> Thank you,
> Netmod Chairs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to