Hi,
we have encountered some problem while implementing a feature from
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05, specifically not resolving groupings
and printing uses names instead (Section 2.2).
We have 2 example models, A and B. A defines a container and a grouping. B
defines an augment that adds uses into the container from A and resolves to the
grouping from model A.
grouping A:g;
A:c {
B:uses A:g;
}
Now, if printing model A with the augment not resolving uses we currently print
+--rw c
+---u B:A:g;
since the uses is foreign. We could not decide what the "correct" output should
be and it is likely left to various interpretations but we were wondering what
some of you think. Should it perhaps be only "B:g" since the grouping becomes
local? But what if the grouping would be from a third model, are 2 prefixes
okay? Thanks for your opinions.
Regards,
Michal
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
