Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > .... > > Who needs all this to manage a network? > > > > > > I sometimes get comments from people about NETCONF defaults, like > "You think this is a standard? Why does a vendor get to decide what > is a default leaf?" > > CoMI has taken a different approach. > Every server MUST implement "trim" mode and nothing else. > NETCONF should do the same (but won't)
Since we're now defining a new datastore, <operational>, we have the opportunity to define one single behavour that all servers MUST implement. That's why the draft says that defaults are injected as data flows into <operational>, and that all values that are in use (including defaults), are present in <operational> and always returned. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
