Juergen writes:
> I think it was common practice to write
>
>   reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
>
> instead of just
>
>   reference "RFC 6991";

Agreed, I always do.


> that is to include the RFC title (this can be especially useful with
> longer lists of references and less commonly known RFC numbers). It
> seems that draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18 kind of suggests to only
> use the RFC number (section 3.2 and section 4.7).

If you're suggesting modifying the examples in rfc6087bis, as a 
contributor, I support.

As shepherd, it would be good to hear more support for this change
before formalizing a request.


Kent




_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to