Juergen writes: > I think it was common practice to write > > reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; > > instead of just > > reference "RFC 6991";
Agreed, I always do. > that is to include the RFC title (this can be especially useful with > longer lists of references and less commonly known RFC numbers). It > seems that draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18 kind of suggests to only > use the RFC number (section 3.2 and section 4.7). If you're suggesting modifying the examples in rfc6087bis, as a contributor, I support. As shepherd, it would be good to hear more support for this change before formalizing a request. Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
