> I think it was common practice to write
> reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
> instead of just
> reference "RFC 6991";
Agreed, I always do.
> that is to include the RFC title (this can be especially useful with
> longer lists of references and less commonly known RFC numbers). It
> seems that draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18 kind of suggests to only
> use the RFC number (section 3.2 and section 4.7).
If you're suggesting modifying the examples in rfc6087bis, as a
contributor, I support.
As shepherd, it would be good to hear more support for this change
before formalizing a request.
netmod mailing list