Jürgen, It makes sense. This comment should be considered as an IETF LC comment.
Regards, B.
Hi, I think it was common practice to write reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; instead of just reference "RFC 6991"; that is to include the RFC title (this can be especially useful with longer lists of references and less commonly known RFC numbers). It seems that draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18 kind of suggests to only use the RFC number (section 3.2 and section 4.7). /js
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
