On 14.03.18 10:42, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>     <KENT>BTW, why is the container called "access-lists" and not
>     e.g., "acls".  I thought that there was a node-naming idiom along
>     the lines of "/widgets/widget" for when a list is a descendent of
>     a container.
>
>  
>
> History. When we inherited the draft, it was named access-lists. I can
> change it to “acls”.
>
>
> <<KENT>> I think it should be "acls", but I wouldn't want to make this
> change unilaterally. 
>
> Does anybody else have an issue with the container being called
> "access-lists" ?
>

I would be opposed to a change at this point.  It doesn't change
functionality and we're not saving that many characters.  What is there
is clear.  Please can we just leave this alone.


Eliot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to