Hello Juergen,
Sorry the wording was misleading. I want these capabilities both as
state data AND as instance-data-files, because
there is a need to know this information before you ever see the real
network node. How about the following?
"YANG servers SHOULD document server capabilities that are available via
Netconf/Restconf (as YANG defined data) also using instance-data-files."
regards Balazs
On 6/26/2018 4:58 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
Hello Martin,
IMHO it would be good to recommend as a general practice that YANG servers
SHOULD document their capabilities using instance data. Even though "the
set of server capabilities to be documented will be defined by other
standards and specifications ..." it would still be good to make the
general recommendation to do this.
If the group thinks this general recommnedation is a bad idea, I think
this chapter should be merged with 2.2 Use case 1.
Why would server capabilities not be more state data? Why would a
client have to fetch files (how?) to obtain knowledge about server
capabilities?
/js
--
Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
Senior Specialist
Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
