On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:31:27PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote: > Hello Juergen, > > Sorry the wording was misleading. I want these capabilities both as state > data AND as instance-data-files, because > there is a need to know this information before you ever see the real > network node. How about the following? > > "YANG servers SHOULD document server capabilities that are available via > Netconf/Restconf (as YANG defined data) also using instance-data-files." >
I am against this. I think we should standardize the format and not how the format is used. And it remains unclear why this would be a SHOULD or how one implements this SHOULD and in which cases one can ignore it. Again, I do not like to mix specification of mechanisms with the specification of policies how mechanisms are to be used. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
