Hi Suresh, > On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This document is missing ACL handling for ICMPv6 (RFC4443) completely. As the > ICMP types and codes are different for ICMP and ICMPv6 I think this model > should be included to cover ICMPv6.
I understand that there are many protocols that fall into such a criteria. As has already been discussed, we are offering the minimum set of protocols for which there is a demand, while giving the option to extend it through augmentations of the base model. Let us not boil the ocean. As it is, this draft has been in the works for more than 4 years. > > > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
