> On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This document is missing ACL handling for ICMPv6 (RFC4443) completely. As the > ICMP types and codes are different for ICMP and ICMPv6 I think this model > should be included to cover ICMPv6.
In offline discussions with Suresh, here is what we agreed I would do to address this DISCUSS: - Update the rest-of-header field in ICMP grouping from ‘type uint32’ to ‘type binary’, as already agreed, to address Mirja’s DISCUSS. The field will be unbounded. - Add a reference to RFC 4443 in the grouping. - At this point the grouping should be able to cater to both icmpv4 and icmpv6 match requirements. Thanks Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected] _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
