On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > It is even worse than a step backwards. > The draft specifies a lot of details about module tag conformance > that needs to be present in the description-stmt. this seems like an important issue to square away before we move ahead. > The idea that tools must screen-scrape description statements goes against > everything YANG-based management is all about. YANG has extension > statements, so we don't need to put complex syntax into comments and > descriptions.. and parse descriptions for meaning. > IMO all text about module tag conformance and defining tags in > description-stmts > should be removed. There is no explanation why a standard YANG module > would define multiple module-tags for the same module in the first place, > let alone why each different tag would have different conformance > requirements. > > > > ..... > > /js > > > Andy > > > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
