No objection, I support adoption of this document.

Regards,
Reshad.


On 2018-10-02, 9:52 AM, "Kent Watsen" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Reshad, thanks for asking.
    
    It's a grey area.  It could go either way.  Both charters support the work. 
 The chairs are all 50/50 as for best fit.  Squinting, it seems more an 
NMDA-thing than a transport-thing (i.e., not NC or RC specific), and NETMOD is 
more the "NMDA group" than NETCONF, at least the first-order of it seems to be 
that way.
    
    That said, NETCONF is overloaded and NETMOD is not (14 vs 4 drafts).  Of 
course, similar people are in both working groups, but it would be good to 
offload some discussion from the NETCONF list and give this WG something more 
to work on.  I hope this is okay with everyone.
    
    With respect to the adoption poll.  The important thing here is if anyone 
objects.  Do you or anyone else object?
    
    Kent // chair
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <[email protected]>
    Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 8:21 AM
    To: Kent Watsen <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
    
    Kent, I may have asked this question in Montreal but I don't remember the 
answer: why is this document in NETMOD and not in NETCONF?
    
    Regards,
    Reshad.
    
    On 2018-10-01, 2:48 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
    
        The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt
        this draft, and no objections.
        
        This email starts an adoption poll for:
        
          
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dclemm-2Dnetmod-2Dnmda-2Ddiff-2D00&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cMA9GOjXbEWKsL9ICiakKStMZSuPfNOrlbLOOkIrdqU&s=BKA6fI-QY2tt_NTOva9I61482LGGZdzDMFBqVF1O_0s&e=
        
        Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. 
        If objecting, please state your reasons on this thread.
        
        Kent (and Lou and Joel)
        
        _______________________________________________
        netmod mailing list
        [email protected]
        
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cMA9GOjXbEWKsL9ICiakKStMZSuPfNOrlbLOOkIrdqU&s=VClQL9M7t-fz3-dJqMGi8tK-_iyPfbyizqPA_x8VMHo&e=
        
    
    
    

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to