On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:26:17PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 5:43 PM > > > Well, make sure you send your comments to softwire since they have to > > sort this out. > > Indeed. > > The subtext to my query was that if this had had aYANG doctor review, > which I assumed it would have had by now, then there was something I was > misunderstanding about YANG identities and features, but perhaps it is > my understanding of when YANG doctor reviews take place that I was > missing:-) >
Just to be clear: YANG doctors won't catch everything and hence YANG doctor reviews complement other reviews, they do not replace the need for other people's reviews. In particular, YANG doctors usually do not understand what is being modeled. Getting the semantics of lets say identities right remains the job of the working group. And the working group is ultimately responsible for what it produces. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
