On 2018-10-04, 4:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:09:55PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have.
> Interoperability good. Agreed.
>
> But why YANG-patch and not something built for the purpose
> (e.g., YANG-diff) that, in particular, provides an actual diff as
> opposed to a data-tree operation that only shows one of the
> two values?
Because this is yet a third format. There is a certain benefit if a
diff format can also be used to patch. If we create a new diff format,
guess what will come up next...
<RR> And there are ways to get the missing values (from source datastore).
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
