Support adoption of this draft, Two quick comments on this draft 1. section 2.5 factory default setting I would suggest to reference to draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore in section 2.5. I think this draft is complementary to draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore-02, factory datastore can rely on yang instance data file to specify the content of factory datastore. 2. section 2.3 server capability Server capability in the context of this draft is referred to a set of models and features which can be retrieved from yang library, I see server capability as NETCONF capability. I am wondering whether yang data instance file can also be used to specify capability identifiers. Some time I have trouble to understand where the server to get capability identifier and exchange it in the hello message. I understand RFC6470 can advertise the capability change.
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2018年10月8日 19:39 收件人: NetMod WG 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs 主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends Oct 22. Thanks, Lou (and co-chairs) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
