Hi, I still think that this draft should either be split into two, one for specifiying the generic file format (ok with examples), and one for "Documenting Server Capabilities", or the document should just be about the file format (+ *examples*).
[The current document mixes the two; it's a bit as if we had "The YANG language and a model for interfaces" as one doc...] It is clear that the document specifies a file format for YANG instance data, which is good. But it is not clear if the document intends to specify how a server should document its capabilities. The Introduction mainly talks about why it is important to document server capabilities. But then AFAICT there is no normative specification of how a server would document its capabilities. /martin Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations > with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments > you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends Oct 22. > > Thanks, > > Lou (and co-chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
