Hi, Spencer Dawkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I really like that you've provided this capability. > > It might be that I've spent too much time doing Unix, but I wonder if > "Yang > Schema Mount Point" would be a clearer title?
The WG had a couple of discussions about the title, even though this particular proposal hasn't come up. I think the document is about more than just the mount point, so I think we should keep the current title. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
