Hi, Martin, On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:50 AM Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Spencer Dawkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Yes > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > > this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I really like that you've provided this capability. > > > > It might be that I've spent too much time doing Unix, but I wonder if > > "Yang > > Schema Mount Point" would be a clearer title? > > The WG had a couple of discussions about the title, even though this > particular proposal hasn't come up. Excellent - at least it wasn't a completely stupid question. In addition to the term's meaning in Unix, "Mount" is probably used as a verb more often in English than as a noun, so this is one of the cases where not speaking English as my first language would have made this LESS jarring. And that's a win for readers with other backgrounds ;-) > I think the document is about > more than just the mount point, so I think we should keep the current > title. > Sure, and thank you for the feedback. Spencer
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
