On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:11:07PM +0000, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello Jurgen,
>
> As we had many misunderstandings around the datastore parameter, and I am
> still not clear what you would like, could you propose a description text
> for the datastore parameter.
>
Here is a start...
OLD
leaf datastore {
type ds:datastore-ref;
description "The identity of the datastore for which
the instance data is documented for config=true data nodes.
The leaf MAY be absent in which case the running dtastore or
if thats not writable, the candidate datastore is implied.
For config=false data nodes always the operational
data store is implied.";
}
NEW
leaf datastore {
type ds:datastore-ref;
description "The identity of the datastore to which
the instance data belongs.
If this leaf is absent, then the datastore to which the
instance data belongs is undefined. This means that in
particular the meaning of 'config true' data is not well
defined.";
}
/js
PS: I am not a big fan of the indentation style but that is a minor
issue.
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
