I had a chat with the tools team recently and, in the course of things, it was implied that the double backslash approach we have now was both surprising and non-intuitive.
This got me thinking that we may have thrown the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. That is, currently we have a header that reads: NOTE: '\\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX) So why not *also* support a header that reads (note the singe slash): NOTE: '\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX) Whereby this second form only supports the folded line continuing on column 1 (no indents). Thoughts? Kent // contributor
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
