> On Feb 26, 2019, at 14:26, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hey.
>  
> I’ve been having this discussion with Kent off-line, but thought it should 
> come to the list.
>  
> I don’t think it is a good idea to have two approaches. While it would be 
> relatively easy to code for both approaches, it seems to add a degree of 
> confusion if both have to be handled by the same code (consider deciding 
> whether leading space characters are to be retained or not, something that 
> can only be decided when the first non-space character is found), or by 
> having different code for the two different cases.
>  
> It doesn’t seem to me that both cases are needed. We can pick one or the 
> other.

A single slash has been used to wrap long lines in editors and shells for 
decades at this point.

and yeah whatever it is one method seems better than two.

>  
> And *if* we want to allow manual folding so that indents can be made to make 
> the document more human-readable then we have to use a leading ‘\’ on 
> continuation lines to show which spaces should be stripped and which retained.
>  
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>  
> From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: 25 February 2019 22:22
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?
>  
>  
> I had a chat with the tools team recently and, in the course of things, it 
> was implied
> that the double backslash approach we have now was both surprising and 
> non-intuitive. 
>  
> This got me thinking that we may have thrown the proverbial baby out with the 
> bathwater.
> That is, currently we have a header that reads:
>  
>   NOTE: '\\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX)
>  
> So why not *also* support a header that reads (note the singe slash):
>  
>   NOTE: '\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX)
>  
> Whereby this second form only supports the folded line continuing on column 1 
> (no indents).
>  
> Thoughts?
>  
> Kent // contributor
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to