On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. > > I have significant concerns about this draft and work item. The intentions are good and the scope is well-defined. The problem is that this is a very proprietary implementation detail. I have already raised the issue that our server cannot factory reset a single datastore. It can only do that for the whole server (which will setup the datastores in an implementation manner and order). So another RPC is needed, and if-features. I have seen some comments on this issue: "This is great but our server does not work that way, so we need X,Y,Z" (Just like I am doing ;-) How will the WG keep that from happening 10 or 30 times? I support this work if the WG can figure out how to keep it simple. (Meaning I support adoption of the work but not going to wait 2+ years for it) Kent (and Lou) > Andy > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
