Thanks Andy, see reply inline. 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Andy Bierman 发送时间: 2019年3月26日 6:11 收件人: Kent Watsen <[email protected]> 抄送: NetMod WG <[email protected]> 主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:kent%[email protected]>> wrote: This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02 Please voice your support or objections before April 8. I have significant concerns about this draft and work item. The intentions are good and the scope is well-defined. The problem is that this is a very proprietary implementation detail. I have already raised the issue that our server cannot factory reset a single datastore. It can only do that for the whole server (which will setup the datastores in an implementation manner and order). So another RPC is needed, and if-features.. [Qin]: We allow to reset multiple target datastore within the server, that means we have capability to Reset all target datastores in the server. In the YANG module, we do add a note to say: “ // Do we need an extra parameter that may order a restart of // the YANG-server or the whole system? ” So thanks Andy, we are aware this issue. I have seen some comments on this issue: "This is great but our server does not work that way, so we need X,Y,Z" (Just like I am doing ;-) How will the WG keep that from happening 10 or 30 times? I support this work if the WG can figure out how to keep it simple. (Meaning I support adoption of the work but not going to wait 2+ years for it) [Qin]: Thanks, that is also the goal we set for this draft. Kent (and Lou) Andy _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
