Martin Bjorklund píše v St 10. 04. 2019 v 14:26 +0200: > Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in a discussion in the yang-doctors mailing list, Acee noted that > > IANA probably hasn't yet implemented a procedure for updating YANG > > modules corresponding to IANA registries > > I think that this is a false alarm. IANA updates the modules > according to the process. > > > (such a procedure is > > specified, e.g., in the IANA Considerations section of RFC 7224). It > > indeed seems to be the case - for example, a few new interface types > > have been added recently to > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib/ianaiftype-mib > > > > but the module iana-if-type only exists in revision 2014-05-08. > > See > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml > > The latest version is [email protected] > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/[email protected] > > > > A part of the problem may be that there is AFAIK no authoritative > > repository for > > YANG modules where IANA could put the new revisions. > > See > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml > > This is the authoritative repo. IANA gets new YANG modules directly > from the RFC editor before they are formatted into the ascii RFC.
Hmm, but then it is kept pretty secret: - RFC 6020 only specifies the new registry "YANG Module Names" and media types in IANA Considerations, not this authoritative module repository. - YANG Catalog doesn't know about the recent revisions of iana-if-type. Lada > > > > /martin -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
