I think that there is another issue at least for ifType.
Somewhere there is a discussion on
> Title : Guidelines and Registration Procedures for
Interface Types
> Authors : David Thaler
> Dan Romascanu
> Filename : draft-thaler-iftype-reg-01.txt
> Pages : 9
> Date : 2019-03-05
>
> Abstract:
> The registration and use of interface types ("ifType" values)
> predated the use of IANA Considerations sections and YANG modules,
> and so confusion has arisen about the interface type allocation
> process. This document provides updated guidelines for the
> definition of new interface types, for consideration by those who
are
> defining, registering, or evaluating those definitions
from which I sort of get a flavour of 'These OAM people have been
messing up our beautiful register of ifType with their untidy MIB and
YANG modules and it is time to take back control'!
I did ask on the Netconf list if anyone knew where it was being
discussed and got no reply.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Bjorklund" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [netmod] IANA modules
> Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in a discussion in the yang-doctors mailing list, Acee noted that
> > IANA probably hasn't yet implemented a procedure for updating YANG
> > modules corresponding to IANA registries
>
> I think that this is a false alarm. IANA updates the modules
> according to the process.
>
> > (such a procedure is
> > specified, e.g., in the IANA Considerations section of RFC 7224). It
> > indeed seems to be the case - for example, a few new interface types
> > have been added recently to
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib/ianaiftype-mib
> >
> > but the module iana-if-type only exists in revision 2014-05-08.
>
> See
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml
>
> The latest version is [email protected]
>
https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-if-type@2019-02-08
..yang
>
>
> > A part of the problem may be that there is AFAIK no authoritative
> > repository for
> > YANG modules where IANA could put the new revisions.
>
> See
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml
>
> This is the authoritative repo. IANA gets new YANG modules directly
> from the RFC editor before they are formatted into the ascii RFC.
>
>
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
