[resending to include list cc] > On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > As discussed offline, you have left out the "masked-tag" container in the > "modules-tags-state" module.
One might read this as an objection that was discussed offline, but I don't think you are objecting, you're just stating what happened, correct? > For consistently, I wonder, whether there shouldn't also be a comment in the > "masked-tag" leaf-list in the main NMDA compatible module to indicate that > "masked-tag" isn't reported in the operational state datastore because the > information is combined into the "tag" leaf-list. Ok, color me confused. For NMDA, why wouldn't masked-tag show up in operational datastore? Isn't the operational datastore the union of the applied intended config (config true nodes) plus the config false nodes? Non-NMDA has no concept of "applied" (operational state of config true nodes), that is why masked-tags don't go in the module-tags-state container. The user can still read the configured masked-tag value on the normal non-deprecated module in the non-NMDA case. Thanks, Chris. > > Thanks, > Rob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps >> Sent: 25 September 2019 17:19 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt >> >> This adds the deprecated non-NMDA state module. >> >> Thanks, >> Chris. >> >>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 12:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : YANG Module Tags >>> Authors : Christian Hopps >>> Lou Berger >>> Dean Bogdanovic >>> Filename : draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt >>> Pages : 18 >>> Date : 2019-09-25 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document provides for the association of tags with YANG modules. >>> The expectation is for such tags to be used to help classify and >>> organize modules. A method for defining, reading and writing a >>> modules tags is provided. Tags may be registered and assigned during >>> module definition; assigned by implementations; or dynamically >>> defined and set by users. This document also provides guidance to >>> future model writers; as such, this document updates RFC8407. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
