Agree with Andy, I am wondering whether masked-tag should be changed into config-false node? If masked-tag is not client generated configuration or system generated configuration, what it should be? System-state?
-Qin 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Andy Bierman 发送时间: 2019年10月4日 0:25 收件人: Christian Hopps <[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:59 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Oct 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christian Hopps <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Sent: 03 October 2019 16:16 >> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Cc: Christian Hopps <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09..txt >> >> [resending to include list cc] >> >>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> As discussed offline, you have left out the "masked-tag" container in >> the "modules-tags-state" module. >> >> One might read this as an objection that was discussed offline, but I >> don't think you are objecting, you're just stating what happened, correct? > > Correct, not objecting, although I might be about to 😉 > > Generally, I think that is what is available in "module-tags-state" should be > directly equivalent to what is available in the operational datastore for > servers that support NMDA. So is this how we're supposed to construct these deprecated state modules, just copy all config true and config false nodes into a new module and mark them all config false? If so fine. I will do that. IMO the deprecated state module only needs a config=false version of the config=true NMDA nodes. Since config=true validation statements are not allowed to reference config=false nodes it should always be possible to remove the config=false nodes from the deprecated state module. Otherwise the config=false nodes show up twice for non-NMDA clients because they can read the NMDA config=false nodes just fine. (The NMDA transition strategy is vague and using the /yang-library tree to hide objects is too complicated, but that is not in scope for module-tags.) Thanks, Chris. Andy _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
