I think that this errata should be accepted. Kent // contributor
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 7:43 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5879 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> > > Section: 3 > > Original Text > ------------- > o schema tree: The definition hierarchy specified within a module. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > o schema tree: The hierarchy of schema nodes defined in the set of all > modules > implemented by a server, as specified in the YANG library data [RFC7895]. > > > > Notes > ----- > The original definition of the term has two problems: > > 1. Schema tree is not limited to a single module. Some YANG constructs, such > as augment and leafref type, may refer to a schema node that is defined in > another module. > > 2. Apart from schema nodes, YANG modules contain definitions that do not > contribute to the schema tree: groupings, typedefs, identities etc. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > Publication Date : August 2016 > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
