I would be extremely careful with a change here. We would need to check carefully all places where "schema tree" is used today to be sure that accepting the errata does not accidentally change semantics.
It may turn out that we use "schema tree" sometimes as "schema tree of a module" and sometimes as "schema tree of a server". It may turn out that we need to make this distinction more carefully and explicit than we have done so far and we may even conclude that we need two different terms to make this distinction. A minor nit: I think the definition should not reference RFC 7895; the definition should stand on its own and ideally RFC 7895 would import the proper defined term from YANG; it should not look like the definition in YANG depends on RFC 7895. /js On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 02:38:36PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > I think that this errata should be accepted. > > Kent // contributor > > > > > On Oct 22, 2019, at 7:43 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, > > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5879 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> > > > > Section: 3 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > o schema tree: The definition hierarchy specified within a module. > > > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > o schema tree: The hierarchy of schema nodes defined in the set of all > > modules > > implemented by a server, as specified in the YANG library data [RFC7895]. > > > > > > > > Notes > > ----- > > The original definition of the term has two problems: > > > > 1. Schema tree is not limited to a single module. Some YANG constructs, > > such as augment and leafref type, may refer to a schema node that is > > defined in another module. > > > > 2. Apart from schema nodes, YANG modules contain definitions that do not > > contribute to the schema tree: groupings, typedefs, identities etc. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > > Publication Date : August 2016 > > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Network Modeling > > Area : Operations and Management > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
