On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 03:35:19PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > > However, I remember that we had a discussion on whether we should > > accept erratas on YANG modules or not. The YANG module exist in > > various places outside of the RFC, such as the IANA site, and it won't > > be corrected there. > > Yes, two thoughts: > - this erratum could marked as document update required. > - we may want to publish a -biz soon
I fail to see the argument. Standards-track RFCs typically lead to some form of code somewhere so errata may always affect implementations and I do not see why YANG is different just because definitions are in a formal notation. Here we resolve a contradiction contained in text of description clauses. If you implement this and run into this contradiction, you likely check the RFC whether there is already an errata. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
