>> Ha. >> >> Let’s create a registry in yang-cbor for id= values (initially filled with >> id=name). >> -sid can then register id=sid in that. > > He? yang-cbor defines how to use sids as ids so I see no reason to not > also register the id=sid in yang-cbor. I thought we settled on > yang-cbor defines what sids are and the sid id details how they are > assigned and how the number space is managed. This way, yang-cbor is > the base document and the sid document has a normative reference to > yang-cbor and comi has a normative reference to yang-cbor. Is there > a reason that speaks against this?
Hi, The media type could simply say “uses the concept of SIDs” or it could say “uses SIDs as allocated in -sid”. I’m not sure the media type needs to say anything at all about this, but if it does, for completeness I think it would need to do the latter (so we can have other media types that get their SIDs elsewhere). That would mean a normative reference from yang-cbor to -sid. The registry trick turns that around. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
