- Lada suggested to replace the inet:domain-name usage in
the union with a new host-name definition that follows
the NR-LDH definition in RFC 5890.
- Unclear which problem is fixed and how this works from a
backwards compatibility perspective.
- See the thread '6991bis: host' in your private list archive
(I can't find it in the IETF archive)
- I can't tell for sure that Lada's proposal is (i) correct and (ii)
not breaking anything
- Proposal: ?
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
