Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:04:55AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > - Lada suggested to replace the inet:domain-name usage in >> > the union with a new host-name definition that follows >> > the NR-LDH definition in RFC 5890. >> > >> > - Unclear which problem is fixed and how this works from a >> > backwards compatibility perspective. >> > >> > - See the thread '6991bis: host' in your private list archive >> > (I can't find it in the IETF archive) >> > >> > - I can't tell for sure that Lada's proposal is (i) correct and (ii) >> > not breaking anything >> > >> > - Proposal: ? >> >> Maybe it is better to basically keep the existing inet:domain name for use >> e.g. in host names that appear in all kinds of non-DNS configuration, and >> leave the definition of a domain name type appropriate for use in DNS zone >> data etc. to DNSOP WG. >> >> So my proposal is to only modify the description accordingly, and in >> particular remove the comment about the use in A/AAAA/SRV resource records, >> because the existing type isn't really suitable for this purpose. >> > > Can you please send OLD NEW text? I do not really see what needs > changes. Note that this type definition gets tweaked everytime by IESG > members as well.
We actually agreed on NEW already here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/FYMAQSJQsPiPSkWTs4lOWIgM2bI/ Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
