On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 8:42 AM Vladimir Vassilev < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/07/2020 21.14, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > - How do we deal with xpath expressions in other encodings > > such as JSON. Do we assume an xpath context populated with > > module names such that module names can be used to qualify > > path expressions. This may need discussion and/or a new > > definition. > > > > - This interacts with the definition of node-instance-identifier. > > > > - Options: (i) Leave this definition as it is. (ii) Detail how this > > type work with encodings that use module names instead of prefixes > > to qualify names. > > > > - Proposal: ? > > > How about leaving the xpath1.0 type definition as it is and specifying a > canonical form for the node-instance-identifier where namespace prefixes > must be module names. > > Since (i) is the only BC option why is (ii) even being considered? Of course a new type name is needed to change the XPath syntax to something that is not backward-compatible. > > /js > > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
