Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > - How do we deal with xpath expressions in other encodings > such as JSON. Do we assume an xpath context populated with > module names such that module names can be used to qualify > path expressions. This may need discussion and/or a new > definition.
XPath context is not only namespaces and prefixes. For example, are the extra functions from RFC 7950 permitted or not? > > - This interacts with the definition of node-instance-identifier. I think it is necessary to first redefine the lexical representation of instance-identifier in YANG. > > - Options: (i) Leave this definition as it is. (ii) Detail how this > type work with encodings that use module names instead of prefixes > to qualify names. I vote for (i), as long as a general solution is probably impossible. Lada > > - Proposal: ? > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
